Home > Dhcp Error > Dhcp Error In Pkt. Punting

Dhcp Error In Pkt. Punting

For some reason, no IP address is obtained. Connect with top rated Experts 9 Experts available now in Live! As said above, both these options does not work in this case, because we have different IP subnets on the two routers, and by default, routers just ignore ARP request from When PE2 receives such traffic from ICL, it can be again flooded to MC-LAG C1. navigate to this website

I have this problem too. 0 votes Correct Answer by tekha about 10 years 7 months ago I've just checked and your ISP is right, there is no newer IOS then It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). No go there either. add to queue 1d00h: DHCP: SDiscover attempt # 1 for entry: 1d00h: DHCP: SDiscover: sending 297 byte length DHCP packet 1d00h: DHCP: SDiscover 297 bytes 1d00h:

Inter-Chassis Control Protocol (ICCP) messages are sent between the two PE devices. nothing else on the network seems to have trouble getting a dhcp address.interface GigabitEthernet0/2 no ip dhcp client request tftp-server-address ip address dhcp client-id GigabitEthernet0/2 no ip redirects no ip unreachables No matter we configure static routes and proxy-arp, local proxy-arp, the two routers still cannot ping each other!

regards version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! All rights reserved. 800 East 96th Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 it.comp.reti.cisco Discussione: Router & FastWeb (troppo vecchio per rispondere) i***@assinformatika.com 2003-07-10 07:35:30 UTC PermalinkRaw Message Nessuno ha mai provato a collegare punting000115: Mar 5 23:32:04.803 CST: DHCP: SDiscover attempt # 3 for entry:000116: Mar 5 23:32:04.803 CST: DHCP: SDiscover: sending 316 byte length DHCP packet000117: Mar 5 23:32:04.803 CST: DHCP: SDiscover 316 VRRP only requires 2.

I've also tried this with a 1700 series router and a pix 506e as well, same result. When I move the 2911 to the 3745's place it will pick up the DHCP from my ISP. Becky posted Sep 28, 2016 Raijintek Aeneas Becky posted Sep 27, 2016 Aorus X5 v6 Becky posted Sep 26, 2016 Loading... http://ieoc.com/forums/thread/119368.aspx punting00:14:27: DHCP: QScan: Timed out Selecting state%Unknown DHCP problem..

Ook derde partijen kunnen cookies plaatsen via Tweakers en internetgedrag volgen, zoals bijvoorbeeld het geval is bij embedded video's van YouTube op het forum van Tweakers. punting00:14:27: DHCP: QScan: Timed out Selecting state%Unknown DHCP problem.. See More 1 2 3 4 5 Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings) Log in or register to post comments jukkaholm Wed, 02/22/2006 - 06:33 After upgrading to 12.3(14)T1 the device now On FPC0, the microkernel analyzes the packet and determines whether the packet needs to be forwarded by the local interface (local to pfe) or whether this packet has already been forwarded

Throughout the book, unless otherwise stated, CLI access is always assumed. http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=1722547&seqNum=9 punting 000736: Mar 6 09:49:59.157 CST: DHCP: QScan: Timed out Selecting state Robbers_Roost# Robbers_Roost#%Unknown DHCP problem.. Private VLAN or on protected port). - Proxy arp (on by default) is used so that router responds on any ARP for subnets outside LAN subnet (e.g. Post Points: 20 12-06-2010 10:39 AM In reply to jchan Joined on 01-11-2009 Elite Points 9,560 Re: Task 7.4 DHCP Reply Contact Thanks rkosylu1!!!

you can connect multiple interfaces of a router to the same network, it just won't work. http://completeprogrammer.net/dhcp-error/dhcp-error-that-keeps.html The router is intended to connect to a DSL modem which needs to allocate the IP address using DHCP. You can't have two interfaces of a router on the same network. 0 LVL 6 Overall: Level 6 Routers 3 Hardware Firewalls 1 Message Assisted Solution by:Mistralol2009-11-27 Yes you can. VRRP allows you to use the interface IP as the IP address of the virtual router, and the router owning the physical interface (R6 in our case) automatically gets priority 255

adding 139.1.0.1 as virtual gateway does not violate rule that says, that you should not add/modify any ip addresses unless explictly specified? Thank You! All Rights Reserved Log in or Sign up Velocity Reviews Home Forums > Newsgroups > Computing > Cisco > DHCP problems in 12.3.14T on 1721 Discussion in 'Cisco' started by Ronald my review here punting000108: Mar 5 23:31:59.775 CST: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/2, changed state to up000109: Mar 5 23:32:00.803 CST: DHCP: SDiscover attempt # 2 for entry:000110: Mar 5 23:32:00.803 CST: DHCP:

The PE1 router is connected using another aggregated Ethernet interface, ae3, to a host, H1, and to another MC-LAG host called C1. It is now a multi-cloud world for most organizations. or: Where ist my DHCP Ingo Hauf, Oct 17, 2003, in forum: Computer Support Replies: 2 Views: 711 Ralph Wade Phillips Oct 18, 2003 Loading...

For the IOS units there is a similar issue with such a debug routput: •CSCsb47557 Symptom: DHCP fails with following message: "DHCP: Scan: bad FQDN option len 3." Conditions: The Option

When the packets arrive at PE2, they can be flooded back to MC- LAG C1. Yeah, it is questionable, I would clarify with lab proctor too. INE staff, can you please include this in the next udpate? regards 0 LVL 50 Overall: Level 50 Routers 39 Hardware Firewalls 10 DHCP 5 Message Active today Accepted Solution by:Don Johnston2009-11-27 Yeah.

Rack13R1(dhcp-config)#lease 365 23 59 ... This is just an idea, I don't know if it works. CCIE #28942 Post Points: 5 01-08-2012 5:00 PM In reply to smiladi Joined on 01-08-2012 Associate Points 230 Re: Task 7.4 DHCP Reply Contact I had the same concern as JDR get redirected here It turns out that the 2911 could not take the infinite lease.

In this example, you configure an MC-LAG across two routers, consisting of two aggregated Ethernet interfaces, an interchassis control link-protection link (ICL-PL), multichassis protection link for the ICL-PL, and ICCP for Device Access Using the CLI Even when planning to manage a Cisco Firewall using a Graphical User Interface (GUI), you probably need to take some initial configuration steps via the CLI. DNS issues [AT&TU-verse] by ss911der253. For that reason I used VRRP, not HSRP.

Just not with dhcp but you may have to be required to give them the same ip address using something like ip unnumbers 0 LVL 50 Overall: Level punting00:13:26: Temp IP addr: 0.0.0.0 for peer on Interface: Ethernet000:13:26: Temp sub net mask: 0.0.0.000:13:26: DHCP Lease server: 0.0.0.0, state: 1 Selecting00:13:26: DHCP transaction id: 8D1AD00:13:26: Lease: 0 secs, Renewal: 0 Have just came across this message while troubleshooting the same debug output for Cisco LWAPP. TIP The parameters for the CLI serial (physical) connection are frequently represented as 9600-8-N-1, meaning 9600 bits per second, 08 data bits, no parity, and 1 stop bit. 2.

If you examine one Packet Forwarding Engine in FPC 0, 1, and 2, PFE1 in FPC1 does not have any interfaces which are member of MC-LAG. ThemeWelcome · log in · join Show navigation Hide navigation HomeReviewsHowChartsLatestSpeed TestRunHistoryPreferencesResultsJitterStreamsServersCountryToolsIntroFAQLine QualitySmoke PingTweak TestLine MonitorMonitor GroupsMy IP isWhoisCalculatorTool PointsNewsNews tip?ForumsAll ForumsHot TopicsGalleryInfoHardwareAll FAQsSite FAQDSL FAQCable TechAboutcontactabout uscommunityISP FAQAdd ISPISP Ind. Promoted by Experts Exchange Engage with tech pros in our community with native advertising, as a Vendor Expert, and more. RonaldClick to expand...